Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not so sure. The same data packet claims that the flight has 2h 25m of flight time left to cover 1167 miles. That works out to 483 mph, which is pretty close to the stated 487 and might be explained by some padding added to the time to account for taxiing.

Unless that 1167 figure is in a different unit it doesn't even come close to working out at 487 knots ground speed.



Coming at this another way:

The blog says the destination was Oakland. The Oakland International Airport is at 37°43′17″N 122°13′15″W. The data packet also contains the current lat and long of the flight as 40.201 and -100.755 respectively. Plugging that in to a distance calculator [2] gives 1163 miles, 1010.6 nautical miles, or 1871.6km. So the distance value of 1167 appears to be miles.

At 487mph covering 1163 miles would take 2.3963039014 hours or ~2h23m. If the speed is knots then it would be 2.08233112598 hours or ~2h5m at 560.4296mph. So mph makes the most sense given an estimated time of arrival of 2h25m.

So I think you are right, the distance appears to be miles and the speed MPH. This makes sense for an in-flight infotainment system on a US domestic flight.

The difference between 1167 and 1163 can probably be explained by the fact that the plane is 6.5 miles in the air traveling at 8 miles per minute and we don't know update interval or if the distance is in the air or on the ground.

[1]: https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?pagename=Oakland_I...

[2]: https://www.omnicalculator.com/other/latitude-longitude-dist...


You have to descend and wait for landing clearance when you approach the airport, adding track miles.

The two units are confusingly close to each other though.


The plane is probably following a flight path and not an actual straight line as well.



... I mean, it could be in nautical miles, no?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: