I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that this generally falls under Secti... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		jameskilton on Sept 20, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: We have successfully completed our migration to RA... I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that this generally falls under Section 230, as you can make the same argument about Comcast, AT&T, et.al. who lets the bytes go over their infrastructure.

kwanbix on Sept 20, 2023 [–]

But the difference is that Comcast, AT&T, et.al can say, jameskilton was using this IP. The VPN is saying, I don't know.

nwellnhof on Sept 20, 2023 | | [–]

That's only a problem if the VPN is in a jurisdiction with data retention laws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_retention

hollander on Sept 20, 2023 | | [–]

What if you get the same IP time and again?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact