I have a similar experience in my industry. Thousands of publications each year from academia totalling billions of dollars in funding with nearly none of it mattering at all. I've lost track of how many times I read a great title to find it had absolutely nothing of value outside of the researcher getting to aggregate some key words for their profile. It's baaaad.
There are some occasional gems, but it's like a handful per decade that are of true value with the rest not even worth the kB they take up in storage.
I may sound bitter, but when I see the government dollars announced it makes me cringe a little bit as I know there are so many better places for that money.
Although I agree that we are framing this thread in the context of the original article, this medical professional is presenting their (experienced) opinion, and GP is not discussing it and instead chooses to require some token criticism of the article. This doesn't seem charitable to someone presenting their professional opinion.
As someone who used to be on the track to academia, this is something that more people should do.
Most published research is false, and even most of the correct stuff is useless.
I'd go so far as to say any research that hasn't directly lead to at least a physical demo being produced can be safely ignored.