They don't optimize for it and I suppose the data distribution is primarily aimed at parallel OLTP rather than OLAP. Just wanted to mention that design-wise it is similar but that's indeed not all there is to it.
I'd be hesitant to store large volumes of data on a single PG instance; don't see how a single-writer, filesystem-based database is suitable at all for data that is large enough to warrant columnar storage
I am more interested in actual OLAP than HTAP, and don't see strong OSS OLAP offering on the market right now, my rants in previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36992039
But I should look at TiDB, they looks like interesting and relatively mature project.
I am wondering why they are saying it is not for OLAP workload..