It is an idea that many floated as soon as Greta turned up in the news.
They didn't like the message, so they decided to attack her rather than the ideas. Use some media based pareidolia and they had a conspiracy to make the world seem right again.
It is easier to attack the person and the ideas of climate change, to stay pure in ideals and intent, than to accept dirty truth that we the people may have had any influence on the world that is even vaguely negative.
I know a lot. Her parents are quite well connected and used their child because it works well in the media.
Children want to please their parents and mimic their views. It's not a great idea to push young children into the media spotlight. It rarely turns out well for the child.
This is what I meant with that you know nothing about her. Her parents didn't push her into the media spotlight. I'm certain some Youtube channel has told you otherwise, but the facts are that she herself was the driving force behind her activism, and she was the one that pushed her family to become more conscious about climate change.
Tell me you don't have children without telling me.
When a child makes it to a top tier of media attention parents are always involved. Children do not have the drive or capability necessary to do such things on their own. Of course the parents say it was all the child's doing, because the real story is not inspiring and actually somewhat ugly.
I do have children. Children with their own wills and drives, that don't all originates from us. They aren't in any way unique in that way.
So you don't know anything about Greta, and has instead this made up story of her that isn't supported by any evidence, and you make up things about what you imagine children are to support your made up story.
