The next prompt would be "explain how it would be possible for her to live and why is it also possible for her to be dead" or "what sort of additional information do you need to establish whether she is alive or dead" etc. See if GPT produces a plausible scenario as evidence of its reasoning.
Just stating "we need more data" is not stating why, and the why is critical for reasoning. You need to produce an example of how she could be dead and how she could be alive.
And preferably state how this apparent paradox can be resolved.
My guess is that GPT will either chase its own tail or backtrack not backing your hypothesis that it figured out example and counterexample.
Just stating "we need more data" is not stating why, and the why is critical for reasoning. You need to produce an example of how she could be dead and how she could be alive. And preferably state how this apparent paradox can be resolved.
My guess is that GPT will either chase its own tail or backtrack not backing your hypothesis that it figured out example and counterexample.