Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Notably, neither provided any extra evidence that LK-99 is a superconductor


They provided evidence that reduces the likelihood of total fraud/fabrication on the part of the original researchers, though.


Agreed! But I think total fraud was already ruled out once the reports from chinese labs reproducing it came out


And the nature.com author didn't cite those reports.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: