Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Do you have a source regarding the theory that the race was the primary factor in deciding the territory following the Mexican American war? I haven't encountered this example before. I'm obviously skeptical but willing to read more.

As a counterpoint, the last several centuries are full of examples of countries establishing territories or colonies in foreign lands with different ethnicities. In those cases, the local population was generally not given much power for self governance, if at all.

The US has a pretty long history of returning militarily conquered territory back to locals for self governance. These countries usually remain within the US sphere of influence of course, and often retain a US military presence, but we dont call it occupation or the territories colonies. Instead we call them allies (e.g. Germany, Japan, the Philippines, S Korea, ect).



Certainly, good point: 2003 UCLA LAW Review: https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/15_...

See first paragraph section C, page 11 (293) -- also citation, but didn't have time to link it here.


Fascinating. Thanks for sharing. While Calhoun comments seem crass, they have significant parallel in contemporary politics.


Yes which makes other contemporary politics topics (cf. Puerto Rico statehood as a lighter one) more enlightening.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: