> This sounds like they're not really taking into account boys needs, with the idea that we shouldn't be "gendered" when relating to them.
I'm not really sure how you got that from the article, practically the entire piece is citations of how boys are different from girls, just not in the way that we think they are culturally.
I'm not really sure how you got that from the article, practically the entire piece is citations of how boys are different from girls, just not in the way that we think they are culturally.