Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

there was zero evidence for either scenario, yet only 1 of them got you labeled a conspiracy theorist


I mean, one of the scenarios involves a conspiracy to cover up the accidental or intentional release of a virus.

The other one doesn't involve a conspiracy of raccoon dogs to sneak a sick member into the city to punish the humans for their consumption.

It can't really be symmetrical.


Only the one that resembled a textbook conspiracy, the first one had some evidence and is still considered part of where the issue started.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: