It seems that the 140x lower storage cost comes from: 1. S3 (OO) vs EBS (ES): ab... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aliencat on June 11, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Show HN: OpenObserve – Elasticsearch/Datadog alter... It seems that the 140x lower storage cost comes from: 1. S3 (OO) vs EBS (ES): about 5x 2. No indexing: About 10x ? 3. No data duplication (due to using S3 I assume) in HA deployment: 3x Is my math right? Or do you use something different for compression? 2 Orders of magnitude of storage saving is pretty impressive.

prabhatsharma on June 11, 2023 [–]

You are right.

aliencat on June 13, 2023 | [–]

Thanks! Best of luck! Looks like a solid product

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact