They could be for the pro extra-judicial killing position you are presenting.
There is sorrow in the world in almost every walk/product/political position. If you can’t recognise your culpability, then we are all doomed to be righteously murdered according to you. No one can sanely support that position. It’s irrational and borderline crazy.
> > And that makes it acceptable to execute a random executive from the firm?
> When one is incapable of recognizing their own culpability in the sorrows of the world, yes.
I am assuming that we all know this is unacceptable and I am explaining the reasoning behind why someone might find this acceptable, namely, and let's quote Outkast this time:
I know you'd like to think your shit don't stank, but
Lean a little bit closer, see
Roses really smell like poo-poo-ooh
Yeah, roses really smell like poo-poo-ooh
So if you happen to be someone who thinks your own shit don't stank you're probably apt to exhibit any number of moral failings.
One could argue that if Ted K recognized that he was as much of a sinner as his victims that he would not have justified his murderous actions.
There is sorrow in the world in almost every walk/product/political position. If you can’t recognise your culpability, then we are all doomed to be righteously murdered according to you. No one can sanely support that position. It’s irrational and borderline crazy.