Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure, that's a problem in almost every form of communication.

What I mean is you don't get to choose what emotions you feel. So making someone feel wrong/bad for feeling them isn't useful.

> two fairly incontrovertible things

You say this, but neither my wife nor I took either as incontrovertible until the last few years.

I don't have a better way of discussing it or bringing it up though. Do you have a phrase that works for this, but isn't prone to misunderstanding?



> Do you have a phrase that works for this, but isn't prone to misunderstanding?

Not a single phrase because there's a decision matrix around the reaction:

1. Do I think I understand why the emotional reaction is happening? 2. Do I think the emotional reaction is healthy? 3. Do I think the emotional reaction is reasonable?

And how I respond depends on the answers to these questions. When the answers to the questions are "no" I fall back to building a space of emotional safety things like:

"Thank you for sharing your feelings with me", "it's ok that you're feeling that way", "feeling that way doesn't make you a bad person". These statements tend more conservative if I'm feeling it's important to remove misunderstanding.


Sure, that's in an interaction, but that kind of phrase is a good starting point when talking about the situations in the abstract. As in any conversation, you then adjust and clarify as needed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: