Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We use both MS SQL and Snowflake heavily. There are clearly instances where having row based storage is appropriate, and also instances where columnar storage outperforms. All based on your workload and not just marketing.


MSSQL is an OLTP based db (going to preclude discussion of its fancy column index stuff it’s capable of). OLTP db’s definitely, definitely have a different role.

I’m talking about the false difference between the likes of ClickHouse and Snowflake, where they’re both column oriented already. I’m asserting that the fundamental differences between “classic” column db’s and “data warehouses” is far less fundamental than the marketing would have us believe. Some of the db’s in this space have slightly different architectures and trade offs, and some deliberately operate at different scales, but they are built for, and operate in, basically the same purpose.


I don't think anyone disagrees with you. Clickhouse and Snowflake are both OLAP; neither are row-based (OLTP).


There's columnar tables in SQL Server, though. Have you tried it? Would be interesting to compare to Snowflake.


As useful and powerful as the columnar tables in mssql are, they’re not on the same level as a full columnar db.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: