Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On the plus side they've not invaded other countries and killed a load of people, not exactly a fair comparison.

When they're not at war would be a good time to bring that up



It makes leadership complicit and is entirely fair if parent is correct; nobody's going to give a shit about wartime grift after the fact.

Men are/were being conscripted to defend that country. Knowing your leadership is selling you out is actionable information to those deciding whether to answer the call.

But this could also be psyops/lies/propaganda. Russia put a lot of effort into influencing opinion over the last two decades.


Is the original claim a general corruption, or one specific to during the war?


Except it is not correct and is a lie.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: