I read this last week - it started off interesting but soon became hard to follow and seemingly rambling. Maybe I just don't get it. Is there a concise answer to what he says chatgpt is really good for?

The middle of that article gets confusing, I became paranoid and began to wonder if the article itself was written by an LLM.

Would love if someone interpreted it in these comments. Not smart enough for the original.

Well for one, he’s 94. And I’m going to guess that this interview may have been carried out over email and that allowed him to sort of let it all out without interruption.

Debunking Noam Chomsky?