Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> However, anyone who has done respectable doses of psychedelics probably agrees with me that there’s a bit more to dreams, NDE and afterlife than “random” neurological firings.

On what is this reasoning based? Do you have any idea of what “random neurological firings” can actually do? Particularly considering that you are not in a situation to understand what is happening when your own brain does its thing, so how can you get any certainty out of this?

It sounds a lot like the “complex behaviour cannot emerge from an assembly of simple systems” we see regularly, an updated version of the watchmaker fallacy. The truth is, you have no clue. More than that, you cannot have a clue because you are trying to observe something through itself, and the thing in question is behaving in such a peculiar way.

That’s why we have things like double blind studies and the scientific method: to try to tease some objective observations out of a complex mess. We don’t understand everything in the brain, far from it. But it’s not magical either. We do understand neurotransmitters, we can look in real time how some patterns change when we eat various substances or do various things.



> But it’s not magical either.

What is the meaning of magical in this context though?


It’s not something that cannot be understood in terms of neurons sending ions across membranes and electrical potentials.


That would vary greatly on the specific meaning one is using for the term "understood".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: