Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is an incorrect and unfair statement that would not pass the test in any court of law. ChatGPT uniquely orders information in a way that gives them a competitive advantage in the marketplace. While the source information is public, the ordering of it is proprietary and a trade secret.

Your argument is a reductio ad absurdum to "everything is made of atoms and no one ones atoms, ergo no one owns anything."



The source information in public? Copyright isn't a thing anymore?

That's news to me.


If you think ChatGPT has infringed on your copyright, you have legal recourse. Do you have evidence?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: