It is, however, far more interesting to me when people are able to split the hypothesis space well. For instance, take the question "Is drinking 1500 ml of water daily good for you?". Well, that depends on what other fluids you consume, whether or not you are on an IV as well, and whether or not you are drinking it by accidental consumption via waterboarding. It even depends on whether or not Baldur the Interstellar Water Hunter exists and will kill you for every drop over 1499 ml that you consume.
It's true, it does depend. But machines can exhaustively describe the hypothesis space now. Comprehensiveness is not the only virtue of a human.
It's true, it does depend. But machines can exhaustively describe the hypothesis space now. Comprehensiveness is not the only virtue of a human.