Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The people that attend when these warrants are executed are highly technically skilled, and obviously Swedish surveillance agencies know Mullvad very well, probably intimately (ie it wouldn’t surprise me if they even have an understanding of their infrastructure).

It’s not at all “highly implausible” that they showed up for a technical discussion to see if the data they wanted but were almost certain did not exist could be retrieved.

If they are confident that this data does not exist, why would they start seizing hardware? As I said: they probably have a basic understanding of how their infrastructure works (especially since Mullvad is fairly open about it), and they likely understand that the second they power off those servers and move them, they are never booting up the same again.

So yeah, what you describe as “look at line 45” is not a silly example, because it’s probably more access than they would ever get than if Mullvad met them with hostility.




The first line of the post:

"On April 18 at least six police officers from the National Operations Department (NOA) of the Swedish Police visited the Mullvad VPN office in Gothenburg with a search warrant."

1) The government put together the cause/case for a warrant.

2) They got it issued.

3) They showed up with six cops from the national police.

That doesn't sound like the setting for a "technical discussion" between two old friends to me...

Have you ever seen a search warrant involving anything technical/electronic executed? They're looking for data and there's no way to know for sure where that data is/might be from anywhere from a single cell phone to a server farm. They show up and take anything/everything electronic (usually enumerated in the search warrant like "storage media, computing devices, etc, etc"). They walk out with it, take it back to a certified technician of some sort to clone/image it for evidentiary purposes, and then maybe give it back at some point (depending on the situation).


The fact that you call NOA "the national police" tells me everything I need to know.


Outright dismissal without any substance says a lot too.

"The National Operations Department (Nationella operativa avdelningen) is tasked with assisting the local police regions and is in charge of international police cooperation and all national operations."[0]

So yes, this was above and beyond a few local cops.

Do you have a better way to summarize this other than saying "the national police"?

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Police_Authority#Natio...


> Have you ever seen a search warrant involving anything technical/electronic executed?

What jurisdiction is your experience within?


>If they are confident that this data does not exist, why would they start seizing hardware?

As retaliation or as a punitive measure. Basically, just to spite them.


I understand that. So why would they want to spite them?


ACAB




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: