Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Very dubious, given that both have since been superseded by better patent-free alternatives.



Which are all built on top of the public disclosure of these algorithms, which was required by... the patents!

Prior to RSA being patented, a lot of encryption was proprietary (and probably mostly broken), and nobody could build on top of it. Post-patent, the RSA inventors could publish details and publicize their invention, which led to the alternatives.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: