Yes, by article I meant that summary and key terms, mostly the summary. Somehow, I just don't have much luck with it, I once asked ChatGPT to give me a summary of a book which I have read, and it provided 5 points, which is correct since the book indeed has 5 main principles (it was Getting things done book), but 2 out of 5 were just incorrect. So in my opinion, the correct workflow would be that AI will generate the summary, or several summaries, and then a human will read the original article and use those generated summaries as a template to write it himself. Otherwise, you could just unintentionally mislead people. With that being said, I actually like what you come up with so far.
Or, you know, being 2023, you can ask GPT to do a better job. So in the first step you generate a summary with GPT as usual, and in the second step it gets analysed by GPT and a new summary is written. You can declare your criteria for what makes a good summary in the second step.
