(It's not at all clear that this fine is due to a lack of regexes.)
If the argument is "banks have to do this because of non-sensical and unjust regulations" - fine, that's one for the lawyers and maybe risk managers.
I understood your position as defending the regulations itself.
(It's not at all clear that this fine is due to a lack of regexes.)
If the argument is "banks have to do this because of non-sensical and unjust regulations" - fine, that's one for the lawyers and maybe risk managers.
I understood your position as defending the regulations itself.