> This is presenting a bank run like it is a bad outcome for the people involved. It isn't obvious why that would be so; SVB is now one of the safest banks to park money in
Only when looking in hindsight.
Unless those extremely wealthy people knew that in the eventuality of a bank run the government would offer them shelter, as the government normally does for the ruling class. But that is not in a sense part of her criticism?
Only when looking in hindsight.
Unless those extremely wealthy people knew that in the eventuality of a bank run the government would offer them shelter, as the government normally does for the ruling class. But that is not in a sense part of her criticism?