The core problem is that merit-based entrance is inherently at odds with equality of outcome. Families that are better off rais more capable children on average
I think they raise children who are more effectively socialized and protected more so than more capable. I've known very capable people who don't have the status to refuse to kiss rings and they always get screwed in public schools.
The kids with sufficiently "decent" parents get handled with kid gloves and rule adherence, everyone else gets punched down with half-assery even when if they're experiencing injustice and unfairness.
Have known so many bright kids who get nowhere because of schools.
I'm not sure I follow everything you wrote. Are you saying that poverty produces children and individuals more capable of driving and succeeding in society?
That if one kid is poor or minority or unstable background, etc., and a bit of a loose cannon, they'll get graded lower for the same answers, punished or dismissed if they question anything, not going to be able or willing to check in before school or after class for more help, etc., meanwhile goody two shoes daughter of the town dentists will give the same answers, socialize better with the teacher, who knows the parent's status, and likes the kid, give her points back, and by the end of the semester they'll both be just as smart, but one will have an A- and the other a C+.
Basically kids having the "right" kind of parents and community connections and behavioral signifiers is at least ~1 letter grade overall regardless of students and ability.
