Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

...why is it so much more than the energy required to charge slowly? The battery might get a little warmer while charging, so that's some more waste heat, but the battery gains the same amount of stored energy either way.


You need bigger transmission lines to fast charge. That's expensive. You need to charge enough at the site to justify the line costs.


Alternatively, use cheap local storage to "build up" energy for a fast charge.


It takes $100 of batteries to store 15 cents of electricity. What kind of cheap storage are you envisioning?


You could look into cheaper batteries, as there is no need to use the latest and greatest technology. Supercapacitors might also be an option.

It's all an economic sum, really: when do the higher connection fees and increased demand pricing outweigh battery cost? We are already seeing grid-scale battery storage being used in practice, applying that to a more local use case might not be that unrealistic.

Besides, if the alternative is no charging station, you can probably charge significantly higher fees.


A battery is a box of minerals. It can never cost less than the commodity value of those minerals.

More battery = more minerals. Iron law of batteries.


There is no cheap way to store large amounts of electricity.

EVs are great when in used in the right applications, but trying to make them work for everyone and everything is just going to tarnish the platform.


The grid is unreliable and has problems serving base load in rural areas where charging would be needed


The grid can never support a 100% EV demand. Nationwide, every single transmission line, transformer, and substation would need to be scaled up.

It is a pipe dream to do it in 30 years. I don't even know what to call it doing so in seven. Dementia is probably the most appropriate word given who is pushing it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: