A great example is computer assisted humans are the best chess players. Humans continually prod and break ai, but also improve it.
Another example was the go ai that could be beaten with a trick but humans would never fall into the same trap. But once the flaw is know, a response or learning can be introduced to the computer to solve these issues.
> A great example is computer assisted humans are the best chess players.
Not really a great example. People used to say that 25-30 years ago, when the strongest human (Kasparov) and the strongest chess computer were of comparable strength. The article you linked to mentions "Advanced Chess", which seems to have been a thing in the late 90s, but dried up about 20 years ago, and no-one mentions it in the chess world these days. Except very occasionally as a historical curiosity, to contrast with the situation today and for a while now: the best engines, like Stockfish and Leela, are such strong players that even the strongest human chess players would have nothing to contribute in a human + computer team.
