Note: I'm not trying to engage in political axe-grinding here. I found the below example after about ~30 seconds of looking.
These organizations are fact-forward, but far from unbiased. It's impossible to read an article like this one[0], for example, without a clear understanding of which side of the argument the author is rooting for.
That article is pretty deceptive, actually. Like, how could they bring themselves to include this line:
> "The idea that we have a social contagion encouraging people to be trans in a climate that is this hostile to trans people in so unbelievably offensive," said Chase Strangio, an ACLU lawyer who has litigated against the Arkansas and Alabama laws.
...without mentioning that the number of trans kids has, in fact, been rising rapidly?![1]
