You can call it smoke and mirrors all you want, but its utility is pretty self-evident- you can really just talk with this thing, and it will give reasonable answers. Is it perfect, or even as good as a human? Hell no, but it for sure is not going to get worse, and it's already remarkable in ways that were barely imaginable only a few years ago...
I have a friend that has been using this as an infinitely patient mentor for learning embedded programming, and chatgpt delivers in that capacity unlike any automated system we had before.
If a glorified autocomplete can fake human intelligence reasonably well, maybe we should question our notions of superiority instead of trashtalking the machines...
You can call it smoke and mirrors all you want, but its utility is pretty self-evident- you can really just talk with this thing, and it will give reasonable answers. Is it perfect, or even as good as a human? Hell no, but it for sure is not going to get worse, and it's already remarkable in ways that were barely imaginable only a few years ago...
I have a friend that has been using this as an infinitely patient mentor for learning embedded programming, and chatgpt delivers in that capacity unlike any automated system we had before.
If a glorified autocomplete can fake human intelligence reasonably well, maybe we should question our notions of superiority instead of trashtalking the machines...