math/rand: The original behavior never bothered me and actually motivated deterministic tests. File this under "won't be bothered to read the docs", I guess.
> File this under "won't be bothered to read the docs"
Do you read the docs of every basic feature you use? When you call a rand function, you usually expect it to be seeded. In any language, I'll only read the docs of a rand function to know how it handles bounds. You still can seed it manually in your tests if you want a deterministic behavior.
It's like if you used `time.Now()` only to discover that you first have to call `time.StartClock()` for it to work as expected, it can make sense but is not the commonly expected behavior.
Yes, I do. All languages have weird corner cases in the standard libraries, and third-party dependencies have even worse edge cases. "Plug and play" rarely works for me, and it's better to know how something you plan to rely on in a production environment works, then to just assume it will work.
