I wouldn't say that programming is expressed as OVS. Function calls are VSO, e.g. `push(array, element)`. Method calls are SVO, `array.push(element)`. I speculate that this is why method-style dot-notation has become so dominant over the past few decades, because of its natural familiarity to English speakers as compared to the functional VSO style.

Programming doesn't have a definite order, it depends on language. Some examples:

  movq %rax, %rbx
  add rbx, rax
  (cons a b)
  a := b;
  b 1 a + !

It's not a "programming style" in this case, assembly is the only "computer language" that doesn't fit the Chomsky hierarchy paradigm, because it is too simple

> English passive voice construction is inverted similar to Japanese. It's just OVS vs SVO.

Maybe I misunderstood you, but Japanese is neither of those - it's usually SOV, although could be OSV (and you can omit the subject or object sometimes).