Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't think he's underestimating the UX/design piece, I think it's just outside of the scope of what he's talking about. It seems pretty clear to me that his statement is talking about the underlying AI technology (which makes sense given his background).

And in any case, I wouldn't call anything about the UX or design here innovative - it's obviously a huge improvement in terms of usability, but a chat UI is a pretty well-established thing.




I think the idea of a "prompt" is actually pretty cool. I never saw that framing prior to GPT-3 and I think it reframes the entire idea behind what a model does and how you interact with it.


Then what left is there to explain why this is so much different from the well-established stuff?


"The implementation is left as an exercise to the reader."


It’s easy. Just draw the rest of the owl!


Nobody talks about the dataset. Yes, the model was not innovative. But why hasn't anyone equaled OpenAI yet? Maybe they innovated on data engineering.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: