I don't think psychology has advanced to the point where we can test ideas like this in a peer reviewed study on humans, yet as a personal experience- I have found that it is self evident once I looked deeper into my own feelings and actions. I feel those links do a good job of explaining the idea.
This reminds me, for example of the debate over Carl Jung. Some people say he set the field of psychology back with his scientifically untestable theories. Yet, I think it's obvious there is something to what he was saying, and it's likely he wasn't onto nonsense, but rather he was way ahead of his time.
It gets cited in a lot of pop-science and podcasts, but it's not actually the groundbreaking, universally-accepted study that people think it is.
Likewise Gabor Mate is more of a podcast, pop-science guy, not a real researcher. Take his podcast and YouTube content with a grain of salt.