Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like that you ask what SOTA means when the acronym is expanded in the title you see as soon as you click the link.

"ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models"



You missed the point. It's obvious what it means to anybody in ML. But that's not how the term is used.


I’m aware of what SOTA means, but how does that apply to a review? How do we or the authors assess that it is in fact the state of the art (best) without an objective measure? If they mean it’s the most current, every review is state of the art at time of publication by definition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: