You might want to finish TFA, as there are good reasons (as well as bad ones) listed further down. In short, people using public land apparently don't always stay on public land, and one rancher describes the negative effects of this. For example, people using private driveways for parking.
>people using public land apparently don't always stay on public land
Yes that is one of the bad reasons. Put up "private property" posts or similar. If you have such an enormous plot of private land that you cannot manage to enforce a stranger sticking their toe out onto it, and you for some reason really need to enforce to that extent-- that is on you. Consider scaling down your private property.
As for hunting on private property, that seems to a separate issue from the concept of landlocked public land. That's practically a guns issue. Anyway, that doesn't give private property owners dominion over public land.
You're conflating who needs to take care of that - if someone on public land doesn't stay on public land, when they are out they can be charged.
I don't see why you need to change the narrative to be "OH WOE IS ME, THEY TOUCHED THINE PUBLIC, but pissed on thine private a bit". That can be charged with evidence.
People MAYBE doing a crime is not a crime, and is a fucked up premise for you to persue, I'm disappointed in you.
I hate to break it to you - the govt can define walking paths and public lines.
It's going to be difficult to hold anything resembling a conversation with someone that seems to have missed the key points of the article, if it was read at all. Enjoy the rest of your day.
When they are out is literally "When they are in violation of the law" and you're sitting here saying here saying "WOW I CAN'T WAIT TO CHARGE THEM UNTIL THEY CRIME".
Do you want to fuck people up before they commit a crime? DO YOU WANT TO CHARGE TRESPASSING BEFORE THEY TRESPASS?
Several civil rights movements have logged in to see what happens next.
TFA specifically says, no, they are not able because resources are thin. One rancher is quoted as saying that if the enforcement problem were fixed, they wouldn't have a problem with corner-crossing.
It's an article worth reading, that's all I'm saying.
