Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They probably are to some extent, and you know where the liability would lie if they are responsible should something bad happen. What about this case ? There is no sense of responsibility or realization of the danger they are introducing at scale .

Even when they actually admit that they have failed at it [0]. I am not sure if they are aware of the doublespeak in this admission.

[0] Failure to realize a long-term aspirational goal is not fraud.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: