Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The primary source of your "further reading" article is Tucker Carlson. Not saying the claim is incorrect, but are there any trustworthy sources supporting it?


Yes. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-passes-sweeping-re...

If you want to verify it yourself, go to China, open Douyin. Plus, the story makes internal sense - for example, pornography and the kind of soft-core porn, heavily revealing clothing, and so forth that appears on TikTok is actually illegal in China. Post it, you'd get it censored and removed.


You should see the porn on Reddit. This is an American consumer issue not a foreign nation issue.


Given that the source is corroborated, looks like the Tucker Carlson source can be trusted.

Your opinion on reputation is just that.


Liars are capable of telling the truth, but that doesn't mean you should assume what they say is true without corroboration.

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/


The Tucker Carlson peice is accurate. A reasonable person would incorporate that in their opinion of the source.

Politifact "fact check", or really anything that calls itself s fact check, isn't a reliable proxy for forming opinion from primary sources.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: