I am being quite sincere. It was an honest question. When I was in HS, long before Breaking Bad and Meth, party kids took "speed," which was amphetamines.
To reiterate from elsewhere in the thread: My point is that if there is a chance that a reasonably healthy habit like running could possibly alleviate ADHD symptoms, wouldn't it be clearly better to try that before giving kids drugs of any sort?
You're being pedantic. In that elsewhere you also called Ritalin speed. No. Stop it. I don't care what experience you had that you believe justifies spreading myths and misinformation, but here we are.
> long before Breaking Bad and Meth
Your world seems a bit one-dimensional. Running helped one kid. So, we tell every kid to run? What do we do for kids that don't want to run? Force them? What happens when you run out of things to try?
You're perpetuating a world in which humans can't get the right help for their issues because "they should just try X!" It's incredibly tone-deaf.
By the way, Methamphetamine existed long before BB. It was used by Nazis to keep them in fighting shape.
