Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> doing that is insane, and we cannot let madmen in charge of a nuclear football

Zero nuclear is failed policy. It’s lead to war in Ukraine and encourages appeasement with China. We need more flexible doctrine. I’m not sure what it is, but it can’t be no war at all ever with a belligerent nuclear power at all costs. (Conventional only, no sinking capital ships and no strikes on core territory or any civilians would strike me as reasonable, but that also plays to American strengths.)



It’s hard to say it’s a failed policy when we have no evidence against the null hypothesis, which is global nuclear war.


> against the null hypothesis, which is global nuclear war

That’s not the null. Null would be engagement as usual. Nuclear war can occur in both the null and zero nuclear policy states.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: