A lot of things can require a lot of work and still be anti-social. I'm sure serial murderers work very hard.

There's a reason there aren't that many serial murderers, and why we don't orient society around catching those at the expense of everything.

Take the act of stealing and project it onto the {anti, neutral, pro}-social dimension. It’s clearly not pro-social; I think it’s easy to argue that it’s not neutral either.

Maybe I misread the original point of the post, but I read it as "the anti-social component is the motivator".

Of course it's ... not good! Stealing is generally pretty bad, all things considered! But this idea that there are some deep psychological flaws that cause this behavior does not, I believe, represent a primary motivator for a significant portion of these acts.