Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you saying Twitter is paying ~$1.5B in interest rates every year?


Yes that's the approximate amount they have to pay due to the way he's done the financing of the deal. Keep in mind that the current interest is at a similar amount to there revenues from last year.

That's the reason to deeply cut expenses and to try and make more money. He could probably have serviced that debt if everything just kept going as normal (no big ad spend cut) and he had fired everyone but that's an impossible scenario.


It’s going to be something like that. He bought it for 44 billion. That was mostly loans. Those loans are transferred to the company and the company pays interest on them.


>He bought it for 44 billion. That was mostly loans.

That's not true if media reports about the purchase was accurate. The debt financing was only $13 billion: https://www.google.com/search?q=musk+buys+twitter+%22%2413+b...

The more complete funding structure[1] looked like this:

+ $24 billion : Elon Musk personal wealth (e.g. selling some of his TESLA stock to raise money)

+ $7 billion : other equity investors (Saudi Arabia prince, Larry Ellison, etc.)

+ $13 billion: bank loans

The Twitter puchase was mostly Elon's personal money (~54%) and not debt.

[1] https://archive.ph/L6Mhv


https://thepolicytimes.com/top-10-richest-people-worth-more-...

So, a handle of individuals can dwarf most countries GPD.


GDP is a flow per year. Like the flow of water through a pipe. Wealth is a stock. Like the quantity of water in a barrel.

Please pass this on when you see this cheap talking point, thanks.


And a couple of small countries can dwarf that entire group ;)

https://www.nbim.no/


That's only like $1 trillion, so just several of the world's richest people.


But who is issuing these loans? It should be pretty obvious that you would never see that money back right?


The banks committed to the loans at the point of the takeover proposal (end of April). The macroeconomic lookout was better. Since then, just about every tech stock is down >20% and Musk has helpfully made unfounded accusations of bots and spam and whatnot in a pointless attempt to delay the acquisition, meaning the banks now have to try and unload these loans in a recession. I think last I heard they are giving a 40% discount or just keeping them on their books, hoping for a recovery as Musk trashes the company value further with every week that passes.


Per link upthread: Bank of America, Barclays and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, apparently. I've also heard Morgan Stanley mentioned.


Don't forget Qatar Holding and some oilprince from Saudi Arabia which are now also major shareholders


Only if the people issuing the loans are basing their decisions off of media coverage.


The interest rate of the loans is based on an index + fixed %. If the index goes up, like in an inflationary environment, so do the payments.


I hear $1bn quoted but maybe $1.5nm is accurate.


> maybe $1.5nm is accurate

Nanometers?


Newton meters I think.


Nanomillions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: