Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The ethos of the credo is egalitarian, not restrictive. So in this particular case, "the need" is not being satisfied.

The person defines what they need, not some third party who has obvious conflict of interest in down-estimating the needs.



for socialism (which is the ethos of the statement) of course its a third party that determines your needs and any third party has a conflict


It is not "of course" a third party at all. Socialism is not "when the government does stuff".


In any real-world application of socialism I've seen, it is indeed the government deciding how much one is given. I can't think of any implementation where the government asks the citizen how large of a slice of the pie they'd like.

I'm happy to be proved wrong, and maybe someday there'll be a successful communist state, but until then I look to history.


Right. I suppose I can't fault you to equate all of socialist ideas with what you have seen.

There are socialists who are anti-state, for example. Check out Anarcho Communism, who very much use the "...according to their needs" ethos.


I'm all for blockchain socialism, but I doubt it will be called that ...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: