Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can read in the conversation that Google was not able to reproduce it the first time the bug was submitted:

> The same issue was submitted to our program earlier this year, but we were not able to reproduce the vulnerability. When you submitted your report, we were able to identify and reproduce the issue and began developing a fix.

I wonder if it really was the same bug or what they did wrong to reproduce it. Or maybe they just made some mistake in reproducing it.



Agreed. If the first bug was

> I did something weird after putting in a new PIN, and I was able to access my home screen without my password, but I'm not sure of the exact steps I did

then that's not really a duplicate. If the original bug report doesn't have enough information to recreate the steps, the second one is the only real bug report.


Yes. The first one is more like a user complaint than an actual reproducible bug report.


Then if that’s the case, the author should have been paid a full payout, not a “thanks for making us fix this” payment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: