It's funny how the media were all over russian meddling into the 2016 elections but not a whisper of russian meddling in the 2020 elections. Either a) russia behaved in 2020 (which is not what this article suggest), or b) these interferences are background noise that don't have much of an impact (2020 elections treatment but then what about 2016?) or c) these interferences have a material impact (2016 elections treatment but then what about 2020?).
a) is highly improbable, b) and c) are proof that the media narrative is all bullshit to push a political agenda.
these days the only two media I "trust" is apnews and reuters, all the rest are biased one way or another, I simply ignore all of them.
I read axios once a while because it's short, and, it seems more objective than all the rest(except for APNews and Reuters that is), so it's the 3rd site I visit.
I used to do the same, trust news agencies, which until recently were neutral and had much higher standards. But those are going fast. I think the most shocking example for me is when Reuters embargo-ed a story about Beto O'Rourke's hacking past, until after the 2018 election to not risk helping Cruz. And I have seen countless news agency articles that were clearly politically biased since.
not aware of that, that's a shame indeed. I hope there is still true journalism on earth, problem is, where is it? as an independent, all I want is to read the facts, like it used to be, long long time ago though.
a) is highly improbable, b) and c) are proof that the media narrative is all bullshit to push a political agenda.