Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Too many people, too fast. There's no way these are going to be sensible, surgical layoffs.

If I were working there, I'd want the layoffs to be as swift and brief as possible. Having the sword of Damocles hanging over my head day to day would be unbearable. I'd rather Twitter have one big layoff and then re-focus on the product if it were me.

> The service is definitely going to suffer.

I see this claim, but don't quite get it. What are engineers doing there? Are they like Homer Simpson pushing a red button every day to keep the site running? It seems like kind of a set-and-forget type of operation at this point, since so few new features are developed. They copied a couple of other social media startups (Clubhouse & Substack) in the past couple of years, and they changed the stylesheet, but otherwise, doesn't seem like much has happened. Have they done a ton of optimization work that we simply don't know about? (And if not, why do they need it?) I just don't get the claim.

FWIW, I'm expecting to see essentially no difference in Twitter for at least six months.



They're working on that 'edit' button.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: