The citation indexed [40] (that is, the relevant portion) in your quote points to the Register article you also linked, just as the Wikipedia entry does in support of the statement:
"Unlike SA-00075, this bug is even present if AMT is absent, not provisioned or if the ME was "disabled" by any of the known unofficial methods."
That being the case I would expect the Register article to contain something that bolsters the quote above but if it does, it is so subtle as to escape my repeated rereading.
Sorry to be a stickler, but not really.
The citation indexed [40] (that is, the relevant portion) in your quote points to the Register article you also linked, just as the Wikipedia entry does in support of the statement:
"Unlike SA-00075, this bug is even present if AMT is absent, not provisioned or if the ME was "disabled" by any of the known unofficial methods."
That being the case I would expect the Register article to contain something that bolsters the quote above but if it does, it is so subtle as to escape my repeated rereading.