It was basically a monopolistic warning from one of the founders not to release new products too fast so the company wouldn’t burn out. It worked. But it’s not some scientific or physical law and I hate when people refer to it as such.
According to the article, Moore's Law predates the founding of Intel by several years.
Not about transistor size of performance.
So it was an economic insight, more than anything else.
Intel can't dictate the technology advances of other competitors
It was basically a monopolistic warning from one of the founders not to release new products too fast so the company wouldn’t burn out. It worked. But it’s not some scientific or physical law and I hate when people refer to it as such.