>I strongly disagree with FB's example for "Better citations in action".
I think you misread something. The article that was originally cited is not relevant. It was about someone else becoming CEO for a different organization.
You're right, my mistake. Happy to see though that the current Wikipedia page cites an archived version of a first-hand source though rather than FB's suggestion
I think you misread something. The article that was originally cited is not relevant. It was about someone else becoming CEO for a different organization.