Not much groupthink needed to downvote somebody who feels a single short sentence, with no citations or.. anything really, yet one that goes against current mainstream medical and scientific opinions, is worth writing.
If you actually wanted to try to convince anyone that you might be even somewhere in the vicinity of having a point, you've given up before even trying and opted for pre-complaining about downvotes (something which, on HN, almost guarantees you downvotes even if you're saying something people agree with, btw) rather than suggesting a single piece of data that would lead to any reasonable person thinking "hmm, yeah maybe worth investigating further this theory that vaccines are the cause of UK's current high excess mortality rates".
But I suspect you didn't have much choice, if there actually were a compelling argument to make in support of your claim then, well, you'd be making it.
You're right in that I'm being lazy and shouldn't have commented without backup data. There's plenty of data out there, but why try to collect if the HN readership's thinking is so mainstream that they'll reject any such attempts out of hand?
