Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Chicken is less dangerous than pork.

I am not going to get involved in a religious argument, but I didn't mention it was the only reason, I said it was one of the reasons.



This simply isn’t true. From a health as well as safety standpoint, chicken correlates with worth health outcomes and definitely leads to more illnesses.


The salmonella you get from undercooked chicken is less dangerous than the parasites in under cooked pork.


The difference is that almost all chicken is contaminated while very little pork is.

If we compare contaminated meat, okay, maybe pork is more dangerous. If we compare what people actually encounter, pork appears much less dangerous.


Relative to pork? Source.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: